|
|
Type:
|
Vacation of Rights-of-Way, Easements & Plats
|
Status:
|
Passed
|
|
On agenda:
|
8/13/2024
|
Final action:
|
8/13/2024
|
|
Title:
|
V 24-0005 Public Hearing - Vacating Petition by CND-Rhodine LLC, to vacate portions
of unimproved platted public utility easement of Peninsula at Rhodine Lake a Partial
Replat, in Riverview.
Adopt a Resolution vacating portions of platted public utility easements, lying within (i) Lots 32-39
(Parcel "A") and (ii) Lot 17 and Tract B (together, Parcel "B") as noted on location map, of the plat of
Peninsula at Rhodine Lake a Partial Replat, as recorded in Plat Book 146, Page 102, of the public
records of Hillsborough County, Florida, and being more particularly described in the Resolution.
The proposed vacate areas are located generally lying east of US Highway 301 and north of Rhodine
Drive, in Riverview, and consist of approximately 4,001 square feet (0.09 acres) within Parcel "A";
and approximately 1,100 square feet (0.03 acres) within Parcel "B". County Departments, agencies,
and utility providers have raised no objections and have no current or foreseeable need for the subject
eas...
|
title
|
V 24-0005 Public Hearing - Vacating Petition by CND-Rhodine LLC, to vacate portions |
|
of unimproved platted public utility easement of Peninsula at Rhodine Lake a Partial |
|
Replat, in Riverview. |
|
Adopt a Resolution vacating portions of platted public utility easements, lying within (i) Lots 32-39 |
|
(Parcel “A”) and (ii) Lot 17 and Tract B (together, Parcel “B”) as noted on location map, of the plat of |
|
Peninsula at Rhodine Lake a Partial Replat, as recorded in Plat Book 146, Page 102, of the public |
|
records of Hillsborough County, Florida, and being more particularly described in the Resolution. |
|
The proposed vacate areas are located generally lying east of US Highway 301 and north of Rhodine |
|
Drive, in Riverview, and consist of approximately 4,001 square feet (0.09 acres) within Parcel “A”; |
|
and approximately 1,100 square feet (0.03 acres) within Parcel “B”. County Departments, agencies, |
|
and utility providers have raised no objections and have no current or foreseeable need for the subject |
|
easements. Furthermore, staff notes that if this vacating request is approved, there appears to be |
|
adequate utility easement remaining on the northern boundary of Lots 32-39 and on the western |
|
boundary of Lot 17. Estimated costs for required advertising per statute, recording fees and |
|
processing, are accounted for in the Petitioners application fee of $400. |
|