|
|
Type:
|
Vacation of Rights-of-Way, Easements & Plats
|
Status:
|
Passed
|
|
On agenda:
|
3/19/2024
|
Final action:
|
3/19/2024
|
|
Title:
|
Public Hearing - Vacating Petition by James S. Eggert and Sheryl M. Eggert to vacate a portion
of a 15-foot-wide platted public utility easement within Folio No 072856-0520, in Brandon
Adopt a Resolution vacating a portion of a 15-foot-wide platted public utility easement, lying within
Lot 8, Block 3, of the plat of Holiday Hills- Unit No 3, as recorded in Plat Book 43, Page 85,
of the public records of Hillsborough County, and being more particularly described in the Resolution.
The proposed vacate area is located at 2229 Malibu Drive, within Folio No 072856-0520, generally
lying north of Bloomingdale Avenue and east of John Moore Road, in Brandon, and consists of
approximately 3,944 square feet (0.10 acres). The Petitioners, James S. Eggert and Sheryl M. Eggert,
have submitted this request to allow for the installation of a shed into a portion of the utility easement.
Reviewing departments, agencies, and utility providers have raised no objections to this request. The
financial impa...
|
title
|
Public Hearing - Vacating Petition by James S. Eggert and Sheryl M. Eggert to vacate a portion |
|
of a 15-foot-wide platted public utility easement within Folio No 072856-0520, in Brandon |
|
Adopt a Resolution vacating a portion of a 15-foot-wide platted public utility easement, lying within |
|
Lot 8, Block 3, of the plat of Holiday Hills- Unit No 3, as recorded in Plat Book 43, Page 85, |
|
of the public records of Hillsborough County, and being more particularly described in the Resolution. |
|
The proposed vacate area is located at 2229 Malibu Drive, within Folio No 072856-0520, generally |
|
lying north of Bloomingdale Avenue and east of John Moore Road, in Brandon, and consists of |
|
approximately 3,944 square feet (0.10 acres). The Petitioners, James S. Eggert and Sheryl M. Eggert, |
|
have submitted this request to allow for the installation of a shed into a portion of the utility easement. |
|
Reviewing departments, agencies, and utility providers have raised no objections to this request. The |
|
financial impact associated with this item consisted of required advertising per statute, recording fees and |
|
processing, estimated to be less than $175.00, which are paid for by the Petitioners. |
|